American Economic Review
ISSN 0002-8282 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7981 (Online)
Inattention and Switching Costs as Sources of Inertia in Medicare Part D
American Economic Review
vol. 111,
no. 9, September 2021
(pp. 2737–81)
Abstract
Consumers' health plan choices are highly persistent even though optimal plans change over time. This paper separates two sources of inertia, inattention to plan choice and switching costs. We develop a panel data model with separate attention and choice stages, linked by heterogeneity in acuity, i.e., the ability and willingness to make diligent choices. Using data from Medicare Part D, we find that inattention is an important source of inertia but switching costs also play a role, particularly for low-acuity individuals. Separating the two stages and allowing for heterogeneity is crucial for counterfactual simulations of interventions that reduce inertia.Citation
Heiss, Florian, Daniel McFadden, Joachim Winter, Amelie Wuppermann, and Bo Zhou. 2021. "Inattention and Switching Costs as Sources of Inertia in Medicare Part D." American Economic Review, 111 (9): 2737–81. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20170471Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- G22 Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
- H51 National Government Expenditures and Health
- I13 Health Insurance, Public and Private
- I18 Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- L65 Chemicals; Plastics; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology