This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives
  4. Summer 1987
  5. Anomalies: The January Effect

Journal of Economic Perspectives

ISSN 0895-3309 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7965 (Online)

Anomalies: The January Effect

  • Richard H. Thaler
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 1, no. 1, Summer 1987
(pp. 197–201)
Download Full Text PDF
(Complimentary)

Abstract

This feature will report successful searches for disconfirming evidence -- economic anomalies. As suggested by Thomas Kuhn, an economic anomaly is a result inconsistent with the present economics paradigm. Economics is distinguished from other social sciences by the belief that most (all?) behavior can be explained by assuming that agents have stable, well-defined preferences and make rational choices consistent with those preferences in markets that (eventually) clear. An empirical result is anomalous if it is difficult to "rationalize," or if implausible assumptions are necessary to explain it within the paradigm. The first anomaly we will discuss is the "January effect." Stock prices tend to rise in January, particularly the prices of small firms and firms whose stock price has declined substantially over the past few years. Also, risky stocks earn most of their risk premiums in January.

Citation

Thaler, Richard H. 1987. "Anomalies: The January Effect." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1 (1): 197–201. DOI: 10.1257/jep.1.1.197

JEL Classification

  • 313 Capital Markets--General
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment