This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives
  4. Spring 1999
  5. The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness

Journal of Economic Perspectives

ISSN 0895-3309 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7965 (Online)

The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness

  • Richard A. Posner
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 13, no. 2, Spring 1999
(pp. 91–99)
Download Full Text PDF
(Complimentary)

Abstract

I will consider the law and economics of the use of economic expert witnesses. After introducing the law governing the use of expert witnesses (including economists), I analyze and respond to several concerns regarding the use of expert witnesses. The first is that expert witnesses paid by the respective parties are bound to be partisans ("hired guns") rather than being disinterested, and hence presumptively truthful, or at least honest, witnesses. A second concern is about intelligibility once the expert's evidence has been admitted. A third concern about expert testimony is that opposing experts often cancel each other out. Supposing that the use of economists' testifying as expert witnesses is here to stay, we should consider how the system might be improved. My major proposal is the greater use of court-appointed experts selected on the arbitration model, but I have two additional proposals.

Citation

Posner, Richard, A. 1999. "The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13 (2): 91–99. DOI: 10.1257/jep.13.2.91

JEL Classification

  • A11 Role of Economics; Role of Economists
  • K40 Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior: General
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment