This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives
  4. Summer 2024
  5. Seeking the "Missing Women" of Economics with the Undergraduate Women in Economics Challenge

Journal of Economic Perspectives

ISSN 0895-3309 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7965 (Online)

Seeking the "Missing Women" of Economics with the Undergraduate Women in Economics Challenge

  • Tatyana Avilova
  • Claudia Goldin
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 38, no. 3, Summer 2024
(pp. 137–62)
Download Full Text PDF
(Complimentary)

Abstract

Economics is among the most popular undergraduate majors, especially in top colleges and universities. However, even at the best research universities and liberal arts colleges men outnumber women by two to one, and overall there are about 2.5 males to every female economics major. We discuss why women major in economics less than men and describe a project to increase the number of female economics majors. The Undergraduate Women in Economics (UWE) Challenge was a randomized controlled trial, with 20 treatment and 68 control schools, that we ran for one year in AY 2015–16 to evaluate the impact of light-touch interventions to recruit and retain female economics majors. Treatment schools received funding, guidance, and access to networking with other treatment schools to implement programs such as providing better information to incoming students about the application of economics, exposing students to role models, providing mentoring, and updating course content and pedagogy. Using 2001–2021 data from the NCES-Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) on graduating undergraduates (BAs), we find that UWE was effective in increasing the fraction of female BAs who majored in economics relative to men in liberal arts colleges. Large universities did not show an impact of the treatment, although those that implemented their own RCTs showed moderate success in encouraging more women to major in economics. We discuss what we believe worked in the UWE program and speculate on the reasons for differential treatment impact.

Citation

Avilova, Tatyana, and Claudia Goldin. 2024. "Seeking the "Missing Women" of Economics with the Undergraduate Women in Economics Challenge." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38 (3): 137–62. DOI: 10.1257/jep.38.3.137

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • A11 Role of Economics; Role of Economists; Market for Economists
  • A22 Economic Education and Teaching of Economics: Undergraduate
  • I23 Higher Education; Research Institutions
  • J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment