Migration and Fuel Use in Rural Zambia
Abstract
In low-and middle-income countries, opportunities to increase income are limited; in response, rural households may pursue a migration strategy to increase resources as well as to mitigate risk. This paper explores the implications for fuel use. Migrant remittances make it possible for households to move up the “energy ladder,” shifting from an exclusive reliance on fuelwood that households collect to an increasing use of more modern fuels that can be purchased. The loss of productive labor through migration may itself provoke a shift to purchased rather than collected fuel.Despite the expectation that migration can influence fuel use, relatively few studies have examined household fuel use in relation to migration, and most of them are cross-sectional. This paper uses four waves of panel data collected as part of the Child Grant Program in rural Zambia to examine the connection between migration and the choice of cooking fuel. Importantly, this paper not only investigates migration, but also considers migration within the context of household change.
Our empirical analysis focuses on the marginal effects of migration and other changes in household size and composition to fuel use. We examine household change with greater specificity, from net overall change to a fuller decomposition that distinguishes between 1) returned migrants, births, and other entries into the household and 2) migrants to urban areas, departing members to local areas and other exits from the household. Our results suggest that the number of returned migrants is significantly and positively related to the probability of using fuelwood as the main source of cooking fuel. The effects of out-migration are consistently stronger for longer-distance migration to urban areas as opposed to local moves. These results support our hypotheses that migration has a significant effect on household fuel use and provoke households to move up the “energy ladder”.