« Back to Results

Is the Impact of International Trade on Innovation in the Eye of the Beholder? Views from China, France and Sweden

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 9, 2022 3:45 PM - 5:45 PM (EST)

Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: Daniel Trefler, University of Toronto

Import Competition and Innovation: Evidence from China

Matilde Bombardini
,
University of California-Berkeley
Bingjing Crystal Li
,
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ruoying Wang
,
University of British Columbia

Abstract

Does foreign competition encourage innovation? This question has received renewed attention in two prominent papers by Autor, Dorn, Hanson, Pisano and Shu (2020) and Bloom, Draca and Van Reenen (2016), which come to different conclusions. We contribute to this area of research by exploring the link between innovation and import competition in China, a country that during the period we study (2000-2007) saw both a rapid increase in patenting and a lowering of import barriers due to accession to the WTO. Combining manufacturing firm survey data with customs and patent data, we find that import competition encouraged innovation, but only for the most productive firms. Those top firms saw an increase in patenting rate of 3.6 - 4% for every percentage point drop in import tariffs. The result is quantitatively similar whether we use a sector-wide tariff on output or a weighted tariff at the firm level as a measure of import competition. Consistent with the main finding, top firms also feature increased R&D expenditures and an increase in domestic sales following import liberalization. In addition, we find that in the face of more competition, top firms not only strengthen their core technology, but also enlarge the scope of their patent portfolio. Our empirical findings are consistent with a model of step-by-step innovation à la Aghion et al. (2009) where import competition generally discourages innovation by reducing sector-wide profits, but encourages firms close to the technological frontier to escape competition by increasing investments in R&D.

Exporting Ideas: Knowledge Flows from Expanding Trade in Goods

Philippe Aghion
,
College of France, London School of Economics, and Paris School of Economics
Antonin Bergeaud
,
Bank of France
Matthieu Lequien
,
Bank of France and Paris School of Economics
Timothee Gigout
,
Banque de France
Marc Melitz
,
Harvard University

Abstract

Combining French firm-level administrative, customs and patent data over 1995-2012, and using a difference-in-differences identification strategy with a staggered treatment design, we show that entry by a French firm into a new export market increases its patents' citations received from that destination. The citations generated by the entry are also of higher quality. These citations, linked to the new export relationship, happens both inside and outside of global value chains. Moreover those technological spillovers are stronger for French firms with higher quality patents and in destination countries technologically close to the firm.

The Dynamic Impact of Exporting on Firm R&D Investment

Florin G. Maican
,
University of Gothenburg
Matilda Orth
,
Research Institute of Industrial Economics
Mark J. Roberts
,
Pennsylvania State University
Van Anh Vuong
,
Maastricht University

Abstract

This article estimates a dynamic structural model of firm R&D investment in twelve Swedish manufacturing industries and uses it to measure rates of return to R&D and to simulate the impact of trade restrictions on the investment incentives. R&D spending is found to have a larger impact on firm productivity in the export market than in the domestic market. Export market profits are a substantial source of the expected return to R&D. Counterfactual simulations show that trade restrictions lower both the expected return to R&D and R&D investment level, thus reducing an important source of the dynamic gains from trade. A 20 percent tariff on Swedish exports reduces the expected benefits of R&D by an average of 32.2 percent and lowers the amount of R&D spending by 13.9 percent in the high-tech industries. The corresponding reductions in the low-tech industries are 30.4 and 8.9 percent, respectively. R&D adjustments in response to export tariffs mainly occur on the intensive, rather than the extensive, margin.

Trade and Innovation: The Role of Scale and Competition Effects

Kevin Lim
,
University of Toronto
Daniel Trefler
,
University of Toronto
Miaojie Yu
,
Peking University

Abstract

It is now well understood that increased export opportunities can enhance innovation by increasing the size of a firm’s market. At the same time, firms in a larger market face tougher competition, which can either promote or retard innovation (as in the escape-the-competition effects of Aghion et al., 2001). To better understand this tension between scale and competition we turn to the Chinese experience. We measure innovation very broadly to include patents, R&D expenditures, and the fraction of sales accounted for by new products. We measure competition using a variety of measures including the number of firms, Herfindahl indexes, and Lerner indexes. We examine changes in scale due to both growth in the domestic market and to growth in export opportunities. We are particularly concerned about the endogeneity of exporting and offer a powerful instrument: It is the product of the growth in a firm’s export market conditional on exporting (similar to a standard Bartik instrument) times the probability of the firm exporting. The latter component is new to the literature. We have two findings. First, scale (whether driven by growth in the firm’s domestic market or export market) is an important driver of firm-level innovation. Further, there is considerable heterogeneity in how scale impacts firms at different levels of productivity and size. Second, we find that competition effects drive innovation and in heterogeneous ways that are consistent with escape-the-competition motives.

Discussant(s)
Pamela Medina Quispe
,
University of Toronto
Swapnika Rachapalli
,
University of British Columbia
Scott Orr
,
University of British Columbia
Bingjing Crystal Li
,
Chinese University of Hong Kong
JEL Classifications
  • F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization
  • F1 - Trade