Long-Term and Intergenerational Effects of Government Policies
Paper Session
Sunday, Jan. 5, 2025 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PST)
- Chair: Emilia Simeonova, Johns Hopkins University
Can Public Policies Break the Gender Mold? Evidence from Paternity Leave Reforms in Six Countries
Abstract
We investigate the impact of paternity leave policies on gender role attitudes in the next generation. We measure gender-stereotypical attitudes using an Implicit Association Test with 3,000 online respondents in six countries. Using an RD design, we observe a significant reduction (-0.20 SD) in gender-stereotypical attitudes among men born post-paternity leave implementation. This shift influences career choices, as men whose fathers were affected by the reform are more inclined to pursue counter-stereotypical jobs, particularly in high-skilled occupations like healthcare and education. Our findings highlight how paternity leave fosters egalitarian gender norms and affects the occupational choices of the next generation.The Effects of Universal Pre-K
Abstract
Using universe United States tax data and a difference-in-differences approach that leverages the introduction of universal preschool in Georgia and Oklahoma, we show that universal preschool generated no average increases in earnings for individuals for whom the program was available in early childhood. These average null results obscure significant heterogeneity in the effects of preschool access. Children from low-income backgrounds appear to be no better off overall, and potentially harmed in Georgia, whereas those from families just outside of Head Start (a pre-existing comprehensive education, health, and nutrition program for low-income children in the United States) eligibility earn more as a result of universal preschool availability. A simple theory of treatment contrasts explains much of the heterogeneity in effects across natural subgroups and those constructed intentionally to maximize heterogeneity. Data driven approaches to identify treatment heterogeneity validate the importance of treatment contrast in explaining the observed effects, while also suggesting alternative forms of treatment heterogeneity that were not ex ante apparent. Estimated effects on intermediate outcomes, including educational attainment, incarceration, and receipt of government assistance, align with the pattern of effects on earnings.Discussant(s)
Jacob Bastian
,
Rutgers University
Emilia Simeonova
,
Johns Hopkins University
Juanna Joensen
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
- I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
- J0 - General