Markets for Water and Energy
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025 12:30 PM - 2:15 PM (PST)
- Chair: Kelly Neill, University of Sydney
Using electricity futures to inform the opportunity costs of water releases in hydroelectric schemes
Abstract
Major hydroelectricity facilities have large dams that store potential energy. These facilities usually have market power in the energy market, but also have market power concerning alternate uses of the water, such as releasing water for environmental or drinking water purposes above any regulated requirement. Identifying the opportunity cost of using water to generate electricity from first principles requires solving or approximating a stochastic dynamic programming problem with a vast state space -- a highly technical and specialized problem. The hydroelectric operators therefore have a significant information advantage over jurisdictions seeking to purchase additional environmental and drinking water. In this paper we estimate a predictor function for the opportunity cost of water that best rationalizes the energy market behavior of a major hydroelectric dam in Australia. We report this opportunity cost as a function of dam levels and the prices of energy in futures markets. Our estimates of opportunity costs are invariant are significantly lower than the opportunity costs claimed by the hydro scheme operator, suggesting that their claimed value of water exceeds how they internally value it in their energy market operations.Liquid Markets: An Empirical Analysis of a Water Exchange
Abstract
This paper empirically analyzes the performance of one of the world’s most developed water exchanges, which operates as a primitive limit order market. Upon modeling participants’ choice of order price and order type, I identify their latent value distributions from observed orders and trades. The model flexibly allows for dynamics, risk aversion, and default behavior. Counterfactual simulations suggest the observed exchange attains substantially lower trade surplus than the benchmark of periodic uniform-price market clearing. Droughts exacerbate the gap in surplus per unit traded between the observed exchange and the benchmark. I assess the role of volume frictions, price shading, and temporal dispersion in explaining the gap.Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs: Evidence from California’s Renewable Energy Transition
Abstract
TBCDiscussant(s)
Eric Edwards
,
University of California-Davis
David Rapson
,
University of California-Davis
Ignacia Mercadel
,
University of Florida
Erin Mansur
,
Dartmouth University
JEL Classifications
- Q0 - General
- L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance