« Back to Results

Labour Market, Institutions, and Political Economy in MENA Region

Paper Session

Friday, Jan. 3, 2025 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PST)

San Francisco Marriott Marquis, Walnut
Hosted By: Middle East Economic Association
  • Chair: Hassan Aly, Nile University

Egypt in the Age of Permacrisis

Mahmoud Mohieldin
,
Cairo University and United Nations
Hanan Salem
,
Citi
Amira El-Shal
,
Cairo University
Eman Moustafa
,
Afreximbank

Abstract

The Egyptian economy grapples with persistent challenges and systemic vulnerabilities, often referred to as a “permacrisis.” Various paradigms compete in navigating this enduring state. Acemoglu and Robinson’s seminal work, “Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty” (2012), exposes a crucial divide between inclusive institutions that foster prosperity and extractive ones that perpetuate poverty. Peter Blair Henry, in “Turnaround: Third World Lessons to First World Growth” (2013), highlights the role of pragmatic leadership and strong institutions in driving nations forward amidst hardships.
This paper advocates, firstly, for a holistic approach where both paradigms can be aligned and underpinned by effective political leadership and institutions. The paper draws upon various economic approaches and empirical studies, including the Growth Commission Report (2008), to argue that long-term success in development hinges on strategic integration with the global economy, resource mobility, high savings and investment rates, macroeconomic stability, and effective leadership and governance. It suggests that a pragmatic economic policy that prioritizes learning from past experience and avoiding “bad ideas” is crucial to navigating economic shocks and achieving sustainable development. Secondly, through this lens, the paper adopts an evidence-based approach to evaluate Egypt’s crisis management and reform efforts in response to recurring shocks to the system. The aim is to establish whether Egypt’s crisis management and reform endeavors have contributed to the country’s continued growth and development following such setbacks. Three main crises are analyzed: debt, health, and climate. The paper delves into Egypt's crisis management strategies. It addresses the macroeconomic and health system impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which emerged as a temporary, yet profound shock exacerbated by pre-existing health system vulnerabilities. Additionally, the paper explores the resurgence of threats following the war in Ukraine and evaluates Egypt’s performance against successful developing countries.

Market Power in the Middle East

Ahmed Tohamy
,
Nuffield College
Yevgeniya Korniyenko
,
International Monetary Fund
Weining Xin
,
International Monetary Fund

Abstract

The Middle East and Central Asia (ME&CA) are often perceived as regions with rentier economies and uncompetitive markets. The perception is explained by several factors, including: a large dependence on natural resources and commodities revenue (in particular in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries); and a large presence of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) that have weakened efforts to develop a competitive private sector (Chaudhry 1997). In this paper, we ask a few main questions: Is ME&CA uniquely uncompetitive? How has market power in the region evolved in light of the multiple reforms phases? Has the region seen a marked trend of rising market power similar to the rest of the world? Did markups add to inflationary pressures in GCC and ME&CA? Additionally, we answer the question of whether, in a context with limited capacity to enforce anti-trust laws, VAT policy can act as a backstop to the limited antitrust capacity by placing a restriction on corporate market power. Answering these question has serious implications for the role and importance of antitrust, taxation, and product market reforms in the region. While research on market power has gained prominence recently, few studies have examined market power and its evolution in the ME&CA regions thus far (Robinson & Acemoglu 2012). In contrast, a growing body of research has identified a trend of increasing corporate market power both in the US and across the world (De Loecker et al. 2020, Diez et al. 2018, Autor et al. 2020). Using comprehensive firm accounts from Compustat, we employ two state-of-art methods to estimate markups: the production function approach (pioneered by De Loecker & Warzynski (2012)) and the cost-share approach (as suggested by Bond and Gottardo, (Forthcoming)) to estimate firm-level corporate markups for the ME&CA region between 2004 and 2022.

Labor Market Responses to Rapid Energy Transition in the MENA

Shireen Alazzawi
,
Santa Clara University
Vladimir Hlasny
,
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia

Abstract

Decarbonization, and more broadly green transition, have become reality in many advanced countries where a rising number of workers hold environmentally sustainable jobs. In transitional economies of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) there have been growing calls to decouple economic development from oil extraction or from dependence on oil imports, and to spearhead green employment growth, to ensure sustainable path forward. Performing a classification of skill greenness using the US O*NET data for the years 2015–2023, and mapping the skills to Standard Occupational Classification codes in labor market panel surveys for Egypt (2018), Jordan (2016) and Tunisia (2014), and labor force survey for Palestine (2020), we estimate that currently just below 15% of MENA workers are in green jobs. Using these merged micro level data and regression analysis we study the determinants of having a green job at the individual level. Women are somewhat more represented in green occupations in all countries except in Egypt where men’s green share is higher. More educated workers and those in higher economic strata have higher shares of employment in green occupations, but differences between youth and adults are surprisingly trivial. These findings raise equity concerns over the green transition. MENA policymakers should support the transition toward and growth of green occupations by promoting worker up/reskilling and industry–academia cooperation, expanding active labor market policies including job-match support and provisions to enhance labor flexibility and mobility, and extending loan facility and other resource support to vulnerable entrepreneurs.

Economic and Behavioral Challenges Facing Refugees, IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) and Immigrants

Mohamed El Komi
,
American University-Cairo
Pansce Elkashef
,
American University-Cairo

Abstract

The challenges that are facing refugees and the internally displaced persons (IDPs), as well as their recipient communities, are overwhelming. The latest “official” figures refer to more than 100 million people who are forcibly displaced worldwide, with almost 83% being hosted in low- and middle-income countries. The greatest global displacement crisis continues to be the refugee crisis in Syria, Sudan and currently Gaza. There are nearly 5.6 million registered Syrian refugees residing in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. As from Sudan, there is 1 million refugees in the neighboring countries and around 10 million IDPs within Sudan. Most of Gaza’s population is IDPs. Apart from confronting enormous difficulties in sustaining themselves, refugees also face immense challenges adjusting to a new community once they have migrated into a new society (Newman et al. 2018). Successful refugee and migrant integration have shown to generate novel opportunities for development, and to enrich countries economically, socially and culturally. This research studies the behavioral attitudes of refugees, IDPs and immigrants toward host communities and vice versa. It investigates the most appropriate methods of economic inclusion of refugees, IDPs and immigrants in their host communities. We experimentally study the behavioral attitudes towards and among different groups of refugees and host communities in Lebanon. Then, we make them participate in activities that are documented to enhance cooperation to see the effect on their behavioral and prosocial attitudes towards each other.
JEL Classifications
  • J0 - General
  • P0 - General