« Back to Results

Housing Markets and Household Heterogeneity

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 4, 2020 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PDT)

Marriott Marquis, La Costa
Hosted By: Econometric Society
  • Chair: Kaiji Chen, Emory University

Affordable Housing and City Welfare

Jack Favilukis
,
University of British Columbia
Pierre Mabille
,
New York University
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
,
Columbia University

Abstract

Housing affordability has become the main policy challenge for most large cities in the world. Zoning, rent control, housing vouchers, and tax credits are the main levers employed by policy makers. We build a new dynamic stochastic spatial equilibrium model to evaluate the effect of these policies on house prices, rents, residential construction, labor supply, output, income and wealth inequality, as well as the location decision of households within the city. The analysis incorporates risk, wealth effects, and resident landlords. We calibrate the model to the New York MSA, incorporating current zoning and rent control policies. Our model suggests sizable welfare gains from relaxing zoning regulations in the city center, as well as from expanding rent control and housing voucher programs. Housing affordability policies have a substantial insurance value which offsets efficiency losses due to the misallocation of labor and housing. The calibrated model implies gains in social welfare from policies that reduce housing inequality.

Investors and Housing Affordability

Carlos Garriga
,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Pedro Gete
,
IE University
Athena Tsouderou
,
IE University

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of housing investors on the dynamics of housing affordability, after the Global Financial Crisis. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find that the investors' purchases in the U.S. MSAs, increase the price-to-income ratio, especially in the bottom price-tier of the market, and in areas with large supply restrictions. However, these effects are short-lived. Investors cause a significant supply response, as they increase granting of new building permits. In the medium-term, investors' purchases lead to reductions in prices and improved affordability. These findings should be considered when designing policy regulations.

The Persistent Employment Effects of the 2006-09 United States Housing Wealth Collapse

Saroj Bhattarai
,
University of Texas-Austin
Felipe Schwartzman
,
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Choongryul Yang
,
University of Texas-Austin

Abstract

We show that the housing wealth collapse of 2006-09 had a persistent impact on employment across counties in the US. In particular, localities that had a larger loss in housing net-worth during that period had more depressed employment as late as 2016, without a commensurate population response. The use IV’s and controls to identify the causal impact of the wealth shock amplifies those results, leading to an estimate that a 10 percent change in housing net-worth between 2006 and 2009 causes a 4.5 percent decline in local employment by 2016, as compared with a 2006 baseline. We do not find a long-term causal impact of the shock on wages. Sectoral results indicate, however, that the results are unlikely to be purely a result of persistently low demand, since, contrary to the short-run effects, the effect over the longer horizon is less concentrated in the non-tradables sectors and is instead more prominent in the high-skilled services sector.

Aggregate and Distributional Impacts of Housing Policy: China's Experiment

Kaiji Chen
,
Emory University

Abstract

What's the role of credit conditions in housing booms and busts and what are the distributional consequences of housing booms and busts across households of different characteristics? In this paper, we take China's recent changes in housing policy as an experiment to address these two key issue. During 2014Q4-2016Q3, China relaxed its housing policies by reducing the minimum down payment ratio of non-primary houses from 60-70 percent to 30 percent. By exploiting two unique micro-level data sets, we find that that this policy change induced a significant increase in mortgage credit demand among high-educated middle-aged households, while crowding out mortgage credit to young households. Moreover, consumption growth by middle-aged high-educated households slowed down following this policy change. To quantify the aggregate and distributional impacts of this policy change, we construct an overlapping-generations economy with household heterogeneity and calibrate it to match various aggregate and cross-sectional moments of China. Our policy experiment suggests that a cut in the minimum down payment ratio for non-primary houses involves a self-enforcing effect on housing demand via equilibrium housing price: a reduction in the down payment ratio for non-primary housing triggers an initial housing price increase. This, in turn, generates capital gains for existing homeowners when the policy change and allows them to switch to a larger house by overcoming the credit constraint for housing investment. Such a process is self-enforcing via the equilibrium housing prices due to the interaction between stronger housing demand and higher housing price.
JEL Classifications
  • D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics