« Back to Results

Household Finance and Non-Bank Institutions

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 3, 2021 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM (EST)

Hosted By: American Finance Association
  • Chair: Constantine Yannelis, University of Chicago

Gig-Labor: Trading Safety Nets for Steering Wheels

Vyacheslav Fos
,
Boston College
Ankit Kalda
,
Indiana University
Jordan Nickerson
,
Boston College

Abstract

This paper shows that the introduction of the gig-economy changes the way employees respond to job loss. Using administrative data on unemployment insurance (UI) claims matched with the credit profiles of individuals in the U.S., we show that laid-off employees with access to Uber are less likely to apply for UI benefits, rely less on household debt, and experience fewer delinquencies. Our empirical strategy exploits both the staggered entry of Uber across cities and the differential benefit of Uber's entry across workers based on a proxy for car ownership. Effects are considerably attenuated for car-owners with an auto lease, for whom typical mileage caps reduce the viability of participating on the ride-sharing platform, suggesting the results are not driven by time-varying differences in car-owners and non-owners. Overall, our findings show that the introduction of Uber had a profound effect on labor markets.

Grit and Credit Risk: Evidence from Student Loans

Jess Cornaggia
,
Pennsylvania State University
Kimberly Cornaggia
,
Pennsylvania State University
Han Xia
,
University of Texas-Dallas

Abstract

With a license to use individually identifiable information, including college transcripts, we find that students who quit courses during college are 13% more likely to default on student loans than their perseverant peers, controlling for conventional risk factors. This effect is especially strong when students quit courses in their chosen major and courses at more selective institutions. Similarly, students who voluntarily repeat courses after performing poorly are 13% less likely to default than peers who give up. This effect is stronger when social / monetary costs of repeating courses are especially high. Students’ early-life behavior provides an observable credit risk indicator.

Retail Financial Innovation and Stock Market Dynamics: The Case of Target Date Funds

Jonathan Parker
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Antoinette Schoar
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Yang Sun
,
Brandeis University

Abstract

The rise of Target Date Funds (TDFs) has moved a significant share of retail investors into contrarian trading strategies that rebalance between stocks and bonds so as to maintain age-appropriate portfolio shares. We show that i) TDFs actively rebalance within a few months following differential asset-class returns to maintain stable portfolio shares, ii), this rebalancing drives contrarian rebalancing flows across funds held by TDFs, iii) investors do not move funds into or out of TDFs to offset these flows, and iv) these flows impact the prices of stocks. Across otherwise similar stocks, those with higher (indirect) TDF ownership experience lower returns after higher market-wide performance, a results that holds when looking only at variation in TDF ownership driven by S&P index inclusion. Consistent with this price impact, the stock market exhibits more reversion at the monthly frequency during the recent TDF era. Together, our results suggest that continued growth in TDFs may affect return dynamics and the relation between stock and bond returns.

Peer Effects in Product Adoption

Michael Bailey
,
Facebook
Drew Johnston
,
Harvard University
Theresa Kuchler
,
New York University
Johannes Stroebel
,
New York University
Arlene Wong
,
Princeton University

Abstract

We study the nature of peer effects in the market for new cell phones. Our analysis builds on de-identified data from Facebook that combine information on social networks with information on users’ cell phone models. To identify peer effects, we use variation in friends’ new phone acquisitions resulting from random phone losses and carrier-specific contract terms. A new phone purchase by a friend has a large positive and long-term effect on an individual’s own demand for phones of the same brand, most of which is concentrated on the particular model purchased by the friend. We provide evidence that social learning is a central mechanism behind the observed peer effects. While peer effects increase the overall demand for cell phones, a friend’s purchase of a new phone of a particular brand can reduce individuals’ own demand for phones from competing brands—in particular those running on a different operating system. We discuss the implications of these findings for the nature of firm competition. We also find that stronger peer effects are exerted by more price-sensitive individuals. This positive correlation suggests that the elasticity of aggregate demand is substantially larger than the elasticity of individual demand. Through this channel, peer effects can reduce firms’ markups and, in many models, can contribute to relatively higher consumer surplus and more efficient resource allocation.
Discussant(s)
Dmitri Koustas
,
University of Chicago
Mahyar Kargar
,
University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign
Jules van Binsbergen
,
University of Pennsylvania
Geoffrey Tate
,
University of Maryland
JEL Classifications
  • G2 - Financial Institutions and Services