Research Highlights Article

June 26, 2019

Betting on beach tourism

How do investments in the service sector affect economic growth in developing countries?

Chris Fleisher

Tourists relax on a beach in XCaret park, Mexico.

White sand beaches can be a windfall for local economies, attracting free-spending beach vacationers who drop small fortunes on food, hotels, and entertainment.

But pristine coasts can be a study in contrasts, as some of the most renowned beaches are in the poorest countries. Developing a tourist-based economy could lead to prosperity, and yet, many policymakers have hesitated to encourage it.

“It’s not clear that tourism is something that is desirable over the long run for a country because it’s not as dynamic, or it’s not leading to much innovation,” said Cecile Gaubert, assistant professor at U.C. Berkeley, in an interview with the AEA. “It’s more stagnant as a sector compared to manufacturing. Because of that, a big question is whether or not developing tourism is good for a country or not.”

Research by Gaubert and her Berkeley colleague Benjamin Faber says tourism is, indeed, a good thing for local economies that provides a boost beyond service sector businesses.

A big question is whether or not developing tourism is good for a country or not.

Cecile Gaubert

Their paper in the June issue of The American Economic Review finds that beach tourism in Mexico had positive impacts not only on local hotel revenue and employment, but also helped manufacturers that produced non-tourist goods. The paper provides insights into the long-term impacts that the development of the service sector can have in developing nations, where manufacturing and agriculture often get the most attention.

In a globalized world, tourism has emerged as an important feature in developing economies. Over the past decade, goods and services sold to foreign visitors exceed manufacturing exports in 40 percent of developing countries. The study is based on Mexico, a country where domestic and international tourism started to become an important economic force starting in the 1950s and 60s.

Mexico has a per capita GDP of $9,866, roughly one-seventh of its neighbor to the north and on par with fast-growing nations like Brazil and China. Mexico is a critical link in the global supply chain for many US companies. And like Brazil, it has a vast coastline of world-class beaches that make it a popular tourist destination. Indeed, tourism is the most important services export for developing nations, growing 15 percent between 2003 and 2008, according to the United Nations.

Faber and Gaubert used Mexico’s tourism industry as a way to study interactions between services and goods-producing sectors, and whether tourism could be a viable part of what economists call “agglomeration economies.” These are the benefits that come when different businesses and people locate near each other to form industrial clusters.

Traditionally, the services sector has been considered more stagnant over the long run compared to manufacturing, which is viewed to have higher potential for agglomeration and innovation.

It’s possible that developing a service-based economy based on tourism would lead to negative long-term effects by drawing resources away from sectors with higher growth potential.

Using GIS and satellite data to assess the relative attractiveness of tourist destinations, they looked at how local economies changed for these regions after the tourist industry took off in the mid-20th century.

Being an attractive tourist destination had strong effects on local employment and GDP. A 10 percent increase in local hotel revenues led to a 2.5 percent increase in total employment in that municipality, and a 4 percent increase in nominal GDP. The increases were partly driven by multiplier effects on manufacturing, even if they were not making tourist-related goods.

But those positive spillover effects on manufacturing were offset at the national level, because gains from different businesses clustering together in tourist regions led to a decline in other places that were less touristy.

The overall long-term gains are still sizable, but mostly driven by the direct gains from tourism-related economic activity.

Faber and Gaubert said they hope the findings provide further evidence of the long-term economic effects of tourism development in developing countries.

“There’s this long-standing debate arguing that tourism can be bad in the long run, and others arguing that tourism can be a magical silver bullet bringing development to a region,” Faber said. “The main message for this policy debate . . . is that we find no evidence that the development of tourism at the local service sector is having effects that can hamper development in the long run.”

♦

"Tourism and Economic Develompent: Evidence from Mexico's Coastline" appears in the June issue of the American Economic Review.