« Back to Results

Ethnic Minorities and Migrants

Paper Session

Friday, Jan. 3, 2025 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (PST)

San Francisco Marriott Marquis
Hosted By: Association for Comparative Economic Studies
  • Chair: Shuai Chen, University of Leicester

The Cost of State Building: Evidence from Germany

Leander Heldring
,
Northwestern University

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of a well-functioning bureaucracy on the effectiveness of repression, in the context of Germany's Nazi regime. I compare former Prussian to non-Prussian municipalities within unified Germany in a regression discontinuity framework. When the Nazis persecuted the German Jews, Prussian areas implemented deportations of Jews more efficiently. During the Weimar republic, when Jews were legally protected, violence against Jews is lower in former Prussian areas. In both periods, Prussian local governments had greater `capacity': They were more effective at raising taxes and providing public goods. Capacity derived from greater specialization and better information processing rather than from effort. Democratic oversight and less committed principals reduce, but not reverse, the effect of state capacity on repression.

Building Social Capital Among Forcibly Displaced Children

Abu Siddique
,
Royal Holloway, University of London

Abstract

Forced displacement disrupts the development of social capital among millions of children worldwide. These children face substantial barriers to forming social networks and engaging in cooperative behaviors due to frequent relocations, cutting social ties, and unstable environments. These challenges are especially severe in low- or middle-income countries, where resources and infrastructure are insufficient to meet the needs of displaced children. In partnership with BRAC, we implemented a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a structured play-based intervention on the social capital development of Rohingya refugee children aged 3-5 in refugee camps in Bangladesh. Using lab-in-the-field experiments and rich survey data, we find that the intervention was effective in developing the social capital of refugee children – measured through friendship formation – while also improving their cognitive and motor skills. Social interactions within play centers or developing social skills do not explain these results, instead formation of trust and altruism toward peers and reduction in externalizing behavioral problems explain our findings. Our findings offer important insights into how early interventions can mitigate the negative effects of displacement and present scalable policy solutions to strengthen social capital during childhood in resource-constrained settings.

How Asylum Seekers in the United States Respond to Their Judges: Evidence and Implications

Emily Nix
,
University of Southern California

Abstract

Judges in United States immigration courts exhibit extreme variability in their decisions, with on average a 20 percentage point gap in grant rates between the least versus most lenient judge in a court from 2009-2015. We show that this variability has an important unintended consequence: Asylum seekers quasi-randomly assigned to less lenient immigration judges are more likely to be absent for their immigration hearings. A simulation demonstrates that this type of endogenous response to decision-maker leniency causes bias in second-stage estimates when using the popular randomly assigned decision-maker research design.

Do Beliefs in the Model Minority Stereotype Reduce Attention to Inequality Experienced by Asian Americans?

Shuai Chen
,
University of Leicester

Abstract

We study how prevalent the model minority stereotype about Asian Americans (e.g., hard-working, intelligent) is, and whether such a stereotype reduces people’s attention to inequality experienced by Asians. With a representative US sample (N=3,257), we find that around 90% of the participants either strongly or moderately believe that Asians work harder and are more economically successful compared to other ethnic minorities. We then document that the model minority belief is positively associated with people’s tendency to overestimate incomes for Asians but not for Whites or Blacks. Moreover, in a basic cognitive experiment, people, regardless of their stereotype about Asians, are more likely to see an equal distribution of resources between Asians and people of other races when Asians have less than others by design. Finally, in an experiment of unfair hiring practices, people who hold a strong model minority stereotype are less likely to detect discrimination against Asians than discrimination against Whites. Our results offer new insights into the possible mechanisms behind why many Americans are relatively more apathetic toward Asians’ unfair treatment and adverse experiences compared to those of other races.
JEL Classifications
  • D6 - Welfare Economics
  • J1 - Demographic Economics